Defecatory dysfunction and anal incontinence symptoms among women with pelvic organ prolapse: 5-year retrospective study in a tertiary center.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of DD and AI with POP symptoms in females attending a urogynecology clinic, and to identify factors associated with DD and AI in POP symptoms patients. METHODS: Computer-based medical records of women with POP symptoms attending a urogynecology clinic in a referral tertiary center between January 2016 and December 2020 were reviewed. Demographic data were collected. Selected defecatory dysfunction (DD) and anal incontinence (AI) were recorded. The associations between patient characteristics, site and severity of prolapse, and DD and AI symptoms in POP patients were investigated for identified associated factors. RESULTS: The mean age of the 754 participants was 65.77 ± 9.44 years. Seven hundred and fifteen (94.83%) were menopause. The prevalence of DD and AI in patients with POP symptoms was 44.03% (332/754) and 42.04% (317/754) according to the PFBQ and medical history records, respectively. Advanced posterior wall prolapse (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.10-2.30) and wider GH (OR1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.43) were identified as risk factors for DD by multivariate analysis. Additionally, single-compartment prolapse (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.76) and a stronger pelvic floor muscle assessed with brink score (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.98) are protective factors for AI. CONCLUSION: DD and AI are prevalent among women with POP symptoms who visit a urogynecology clinic. DD should be evaluated in women with POP symptoms especially in women with increased genital hiatus and point Ap beyond the hymen. To prevent AI, women with POP should be encouraged to perform pelvic floor muscle training in order to increase pelvic floor muscle strength.

A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Improvement of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms are common in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), but the explanation is unclear. It is also uncertain whether OAB symptoms improve or persist after POP reduction. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for OAB symptoms in women with POP, and to compare the improvement of OAB symptoms among women in three treatment groups: pelvic floor exercise, pessary, and surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who visited our urogynecology clinic from January 2016 to December 2020. The Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire was used to evaluate selected pelvic floor symptoms (OAB and POP). Demographic characteristics and clinical findings, including Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System and number of prolapsed compartments, were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for OAB symptoms in women with POP. Subgroup analyses were performed in 533 patients to evaluate the improvement of OAB symptoms following POP treatment. Results: A total of 754 patients were analyzed. The incidence of OAB symptoms was 70% (533/754) and two-thirds (65%) reported moderate to severe bother. The lowest points of the anterior wall (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.41-0.87; p = 0.01), longer perineal body (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.21-0.76; p = 0.02), and previous vaginal delivery (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.14-3.89; p = 0.02) were identified as significant risk factors. In the subgroup analyses, improvement in OAB symptoms was observed in 36.6% (195/533) of women who underwent POP treatment. Compared with pelvic floor exercise, pessary (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0.94-2.07; p = 0.10) and surgery (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80-2.12; p = 0.28) had higher odd ratios but the effects were not significant. Conclusion: The prevalence of OAB symptoms in women with POP was high at 70%. Improvement in OAB symptoms was observed in one-third of women who underwent POP treatment. However, there were no significant differences between the treatment methods.